Writing in the stream of:
Starting (and repeating
several times; the spur happening at 4:06) with the meditative 7/8 adagio “Playing in the Band” >"Uncle John's Band"> "Drums"> “Space”
The
meditation on 12/18/04 picks up where the previous day’s writing/thinking
concluded: on the initial and originary of the aesthetic called ‘rapture’ (Rausch)
I searched the pages of this blog before beginning today’s commentary
and I discovered that ‘attunement’ appears in 18 of the previous 301
commentaries, and here is where I introduced ‘attunement,’ during the second
week of Being and Learning 2.0, when
I was only writing short one paragraph summaries and recording videos of
myself reading the original meditation:
PPM11
February 23
I
introduce the musical metaphor of 'mood' to play with Heidegger's category of
'mood of attunement' (der Stimmung). I write: "if mood if understood
to be the capacity of flexibility, then it relates to the term as it used in
the lexicon of musical performance. Here temperament refers to the
adjustment of tone of an instrument to fit the scale in any key, especially
with those instruments that have fixed intonation, like a piano....The
key here is that mood, as mode and temperament, is a way of describing the
result of an adjustment or, to push the point a-tuning." In the beginning
of the video, I note the connections between this writing and the most recent
writing I have completed on music-making philosophy.”
My search was prompted by the citation of Heidegger made on 12/18 that offers context for my sudden turn to ‘rapture’ as a way of describing originary state or modality of learning: “Heidegger, in responding to Nietzsche, says, ‘Rapture is feeling, an embodying attunement, an embodied being that is contained in attunement, attunement woven into embodiment. But attunement lays open Dasein as an enhancing, conducts it in the plentitude of its capacities, which mutually arouse one another and foster enhancement.’”(BL 315)
‘The
learner is in a state of rapture’ is the claim that is now driving the
meditation, and the meditation on 12/18/04 begins, “Rapture is ‘the general
essence of the aesthetic state.’[Heidegger] To ‘be’ en-raptured is to be
captivated, as we said above (6/15/04) ‘to be seized is to be captivated and
drawn into…To be devoted to learning is to be carried into and seized by that
which is always already beyond us…’”(BL
315) And, as I wrote yesterday, this
moment of seizure, which is now being thought as rapture, is the starting point
for my phenomenology of transcendence, and to reiterate what I wrote yesterday:
“The passion of learning is experienced as a ‘seizure’ of person, a “dis-location from the ‘ordinary’ and a seizure into the ‘extra-ordinary.’”(BL 314) Here is where I would begin my own phenomenology of transcendence, and describe learning as an event, a movement from without. [And at the writing of that, the performance of Bach’s music comes to a conclusion.] Indeed, the formation of the learning community via koinōnia is a gathering into a ‘third’, but there is a force or power that gathers, a gathering force. My phenomenology of transcendence follows Nietzsche’s description of the artistic state as the self-overcoming that is a proper overcoming of the ‘self’, specifically, the will. “Learning is a de-struktion of the anthropocentric…the seizure of the ‘self’ away from ‘it-self,’ from the ‘certainty’ of its unilateral projection…This initial and originary state of the aesthetic is called rapture (Rausch).(BL 315)”(12/17/14)
Zarlino interests me
because he emphasizes the power of music to move the listener by “inducing”
passions.” Zarlino’s describes what he calls harmonia
propria, which includes both consonance and dissonance, and can induce
passions. The ‘proper’ (propia) music is the one capable of
inducing passions. In my debate with Arendt I turned to Schoenberg
and thus developed a category of a ‘higher harmony,’ but Zarlino is equally
helpful. There isn’t anything coincidental about ‘passion’ appearing apart from
‘compassion’ on the 50th anniversary of Coltrane’s A
Love Supreme, and for it to be introduced as existential event that is induced from
without by music. Indeed, this is where we discover the
originary state of rapture from whence unfolds learning as music-making
philosophy. – [The “Uncle John’s Band” from 12/18/93 is
remarkable…and only today after 40 years of listening
to the Grateful Dead have I understood that Uncle John is the Gospelist John!!!
Yesterday, 1 hr and 53mins of Bach’s The Passion of St. John,
today, the Grateful Dead’s 12/18/93 unusually long 23:06 “Uncle John’s
Band”: “oh oh, I want to know, how does the song go? Come hear Uncle
John’s band, by the riverside, got some things to talk about here beside the
rising tide. Come hear Uncle John’s band playing to the tide, come on along or
go alone, he’s come to take his children home…………….”] --
“The seizure into the strange is the condition of learning, a condition
we now call the ‘artistic state.’ When we are learning we abide in
‘rapture,’ which both liberates and sustains artistic creation/learning.”(BL 315) [recall
the important moment from the 300th meditation:
Teaching reveals
learning, and, thus, learning begins in the aesthetic state that evolves into
the proper (propia) state of art
making.
“The work appears
en-raptured in/with Being and thereby enraptures those who en-counter it. The learner is seized by learning…and the
one(s) who conduct and arrange the production of learning are the one(s) who
[are] letting the learning of learning be learned by en-joining the aesthetic
state.” (BL 315)
When Heidegger talks of
‘rapture’ he describes that state as the one that ‘attunes’ us to the
“plentitude” of our “capacities, which mutually arouse one another and foster
enhancement.” I read ‘enhancement’ as
the quality of the intensity of the experience happening with rapture, and
describe this as “heightened aliveness,” which today I understand as
complementing ‘higher harmony.’ Again,
if the higher harmony is that which induces our passions, then heightened
aliveness is the modality appearing with the passion of learning. And the teacher is the one who draws the
learner into an encounter with the higher harmony. She doesn’t ‘make’ the harmony, but only
conveys it, indicates its presence, and
draws our attention to it.
The meditation from
12/18/04 concludes: “we have called the modality of the teacher or sage the one
who ‘lets learning be learned,’ the one whose provocative questioning evokes an
encounter with the ‘not yet,’ with the conditions of the actuality of learning,
with ownmost potentiality. The teacher
estranges and thereby invites the learning of learning, the ongoing, perpetual
inter-activity that en-acts the be-ing with the Being of beings.”(BL 316)
3.0 (Wednesday, Portland, ME). I'm listening to the "Playin" from this day in '93 and it is truly extraordinary in its meditative pace. Reading the 2.0 commentary and the highlights from the OPM I realize the stream of consciousness that produced "Being and Learning" was something of a poetic philosophical experiment that produced so much of what has been refined over the years and appears in "LEARN." This is especially the case with the aesthetic experience that is at the heart of the philosophical learner's encounter with the book/text. On this day 20 years ago I wrote the following: “Rapture is ‘the general essence of the aesthetic state.’[Heidegger] To ‘be’ en-raptured is to be captivated, as we said above (6/15/04) ‘to be seized is to be captivated and drawn into…To be devoted to learning is to be carried into and seized by that which is always already beyond us…’”(BL 315). AND: “The passion of learning is experienced as a ‘seizure’ of person, a “dis-location from the ‘ordinary’ and a seizure into the ‘extra-ordinary.’”(BL 314) Here is where I would begin my own phenomenology of transcendence, and describe learning as an event, a movement from without." And here are resonances from "LEARN," specifically, how the experience of "captivation" figures and also the description of learning as an event." Those resonances will be shared in separate posts.
ReplyDelete3.0b - on "captivation" - "As I hear him, Bachelard is suggesting that the significance of the work takes hold of the student, “possesses [them] entirely,” and in this Moment of captivation there is an occurrence of a unity or what Nancy calls “truth” through which the totality of referrals resound and is remixed. The errantry of the discussion, the non-linear jam, is enabled by this remixing, the interpretation that circulates and spins, often pausing and moving back, scratching and scrubbing what has been said and thereby maintaining a syncopated rhythm. The discussion spins away from the direct path and the telos demanded by outcomes-based schooling." AND: "This turning is a negation of the “I,” an epoché: a suspension of the student’s “natural attitude” and setting aside their taken-for-granted assumptions and beliefs. The student is now ready to listen to the voice of the book/text. In a sense, phenomenological reading is a modality of captivation, the student is seized by the text. To borrow from Gadamer’s musings on aesthetics, the text “no longer leaves us the freedom to push it away from us...to accept or reject it on our own terms.” This is the existential situation of philosophical study, a deeply attentive and receptive form of reading, called “attunement,” that happens in the midst of that phenomenological encounter when all other peripheral distractions have been suspended and put aside, and the student is focused entirely on receiving the address of the book, the incessant fecundity arriving from the significant object of study. This opening can also be described as the “originary” through which the poesy of language is disclosed. As Schürmann reminds us, “The ‘originary’ is a rise out of ontological nothingness, out of the pull toward absence that permeates presencing to it very heart.” Thus Martín-Estudillo’s description of Goya’s drawing Más provecho saco de estar solo that “depicts a reader wearing heavy clothes standing in a void.”
ReplyDelete3.0c - on philosophical learning as an event: "The periagôgé as a negation is repeated each time the student enters the solitude of study and responds to the evocation tolle lege, pick up and read. Furthermore, this first moment of the dialectic of philosophical learning is always a beginning, “an original and irreducible event,” one that is initiated by an evocation, a call to pick up the work and read." AND: "The book addresses the reader distinctly each time it is picked up. Study is a reception of that address that is documented with the précis. And each précis is a documentation of the event of study, which, because it is a unique encounter with the text will only ever yield a significant yet limited collection of fragments." AND: "Existence precedes essence, and so the singular event of a philosophical study session is announced when “the word being is pronounced.” The significant object of study stands beyond the author, and its essential solitude denotes its autonomy from the one who has created it. Such is the fata of the libelli."
ReplyDelete