OPM
135 Back in Portland after a truly
remarkable week on Mt. Desert Island.
I am very fortunate to have some very good
friends. When I borrow from Arendt
and write about philosophy arising from
a conversation between friends I have many examples in mind to support that
claim. I have always treasured my
friendships, and gone into some deep depressions when I’ve felt isolated and
disconnected from my friends. For the
past two years, however, I have made some deep connections that I know will
last a lifetime, and I have also reconnected with old friends, and sustained
others. There is no question that something
significant happened in the move to Maine, for in the past two years the bonds
of friendship have strengthened my soul.
I’m prompted to write this because of the
coincidence between the opening citation in OPM 135, and an epistle I received
from one of my dearest friends, which I received today when I returned to
Portland. I use the word ‘epistle’
because my friend and I share a bond that is virtually familial, and he seems
very much to be the younger brother I never had growing up. This bond, which links our common interest
and approach to philosophy and even music, is a Latino inflected Catholicism,
one that is an expression of community, family, justice, art, and above all
else, is made and remade each day through the unyielding ever giving Holy
Spirit of Love. Thus, I use the word
‘epistle’ to describe the letter my friend sent me, which he categorized as a
memo [written during his slow move with his wife and three children from the Midwestern Plains to the Pacific
Northwest]. Like Paul, the letter was a
plea from his heart written to a friend about their friendship and the ways to
sustain it. There is always a fear that
a dear friend, like a family member, will suddenly be gone from our lives. Of course, we are all aware of mortality, but
equally painful can be the sudden breaking off of communication, the loss of
trust, the sudden change in the way we perceive or are perceived. And as we grow older we understand ourselves
well enough to know just how vital and fragile our friendships are and how
easily we can forget to care for them, to tend to them, and to make sure that
we allow ourselves to be cared for in the process of caring for the
relationship. For me, the joys of
friendship are always rooted in the mutual trust I share with my friends, which
allows us to share moments of intense life together, laughing, sometimes
arguing, but also keeping it real. And
for this reason I don’t fear being vulnerable and being totally present with my
friends, although I do fear being abandoned by my friends. That is to say, it is always painful when I
realize that someone I believed was a friend turned out to be just another
person I may have spent some significant time with, but, in the end, did not
place a high value or priority on being a member of a shared community. I write all of this because I was deeply
moved by the honesty and sincerity with which my dear friend, my younger
brother, addressed me when he confessed his fear that he had somehow abandoned
our friendship, or, that he would at some point in the future do just
that. I know of no other friend who
would take the time to write such a letter, to write an epistle, and to repeat
back to me the very core values of my own spirituality and faith in humanity.
The epistle connects with the opening line from
OPM 135, a citation from Lao Tzu, that conveys learning to be beyond the giving
and taking of orders, “not the result of any ordination, but always a
spontaneous tribute.” I write of
‘learning’ in OPM 135, but I could easily have written ‘thinking’ or ‘wisdom’
or even ‘friendship,’ which are all part of the same family of terms. When
Lao Tzu speaks of ‘ordination’ he is referring to ‘putting things in order’ by
way of a formal ceremony, which is to say pro
forma. In contrast to this he
speaks of ‘spontaneity’ as the authentic way
of things. If there is an order to
things, then this order happens by way of a flow that organizes via
improvisation and spontaneity. Of
course, this is precisely what attracts me to Lao Tzu, and what I tried to
emulate and follow in the writing of these meditations. But I am focused tonight on this because I
understand my friend’s epistle as very much an act of spontaneity, and one that
had character of a ‘tribute,’ in the sense of showing gratitude and respect for
the friendship we share, and, more generally, for the community we have been
trying to form through our mutual friendships.
I could hardly have anticipated receiving such an epistle, and because
it was so unexpected and spontaneous it has had an empowering impact on me,
such that I am coding it as part of what was most certainly one of the most
memorable weeks I have experienced in a very long time.
3.0 - (Friday, Portland, ME) - Ten years since Rocha went from ND to UBC! I remember meeting him earlier the previous autumn. He was desperate to leave UND. With the help of friends, including myself, he was able to make a move to one of the great universities and cities. Vancouver! Lucky man. He's super talented and has earned many accolades. Well deserved Sam! Keep thriving.
ReplyDeleteOPM 135 reminds me that I'm enamored with Lao Tzu's commitment to spontaneity. He describes following the Tao as "spontaneous tribute" as opposed "ordination". Translation is complex. Especially when dealing with an notoriously enigmatic text from an ancient philosopher. The best I can make of the distinction is that following the Tao is not the equivalent of following orders, i.e, "ordination." Rather, it is a matter of receiving the Tao spontaneously. The "tribute" is a gift from the Tao, literally a portion of the Tao. I'm not sure that works, because Being, the Tao is not "outside" of us. Existence 'is' and we are part of it. The Tao is a name for the flow of Being. And the sage is the one who is caught in that flow. In turn the sage's 'being' or manner of existence is directed by the flow of the Tao. And the chief characteristic of that flow is spontaneity. This is what makes the sage a bit of an jazz teacher. One who is adept at improvisation. That's not much more that can be said about that, other than to remember that, keep it close! And part of the memory is remembering not to romanticize the flow. The Tao is dialectical. And the spontaneous is also a name for the unpredictable, which also includes the catastrophic. The flow of the Tao includes the sudden and unexpected existential seismic event, the volcanic eruption, the tsunami, the cyclone, flash flood, etc. These metaphors need to be taken seriously. Lao Tzu is teaching (perhaps warning us) that we should be prepared for the inevitable catastrophes.